- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/29/12 at 10:24 pm to Mr Gardoki
I'm actually just starting to read the book. That's why I was able to answer his question. I just got done with Bilbo's escape from Gollum. So I guess I don't have an opinion either way yet. I do see where extra content was needed to make three, three hour movies. The book goes by pretty quickly.
Posted on 12/30/12 at 2:33 pm to Mr Gardoki
quote:
I guess my next question would be how you felt about the extra content? Personally I enjoyed it but I'm not strict about sticking with the original.
I would have been disappointed if they didn't add this stuff. I've always been interested in the necromancer aka sauron since I've read the books and very intrigued by the appendices with his story.
It gives the hobbit movie even more life because you think Smaug is the only legitimate threat which technically he is in the book but the movie gets to expand on that and show what gandalf is doing while he is away so long. There is a bigger power in the shadows during all this which is the necromancer.
This post was edited on 12/30/12 at 2:35 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News