re: One of Ohio's best HS football teams/town going to be all over the news

quote:

---

no i'm consistently comparing the 2 systems

---

As I already said, only when it's convenient fr you. See above for another example.

quote:

---

the kid was put in a kangaroo court and was presumed guilty and had to prove his innocence to a person with no rules, regulations, or even a set standard of behavior that he's trying to punish. it was a faceless coward-criminal who refuses to be publicly accountable for his actions

---

Another irrelevant circle. The kid proved his innocence and was acquitted of his charges. How did he not have a chance to defend himself?

quote:

---

we don't even know what behavior constitutes a "Crime" in this situation, though

---

This is another one of those situations where technically it's open to interpretation, but only a retard would interpret it the way you are.

quote:

---

i said i assume, which means it's mostly a gut feeling.

---

So is now the time that I get on my soapbox about you accusing someone of something on an obscure Internet website about something you have no proofs of? Or is this another thing only you are allowed to do?

quote:

---

(2) the intricate knowledge of the people, especially naming somebody as a "booster" in the 2nd video.

---

They hacked the guy's email. Is it not possible they found a single email exchange about donating money to the school or football team, therefore making him a booster?

quote:

---

what isn't adding up is their starting point...the information that they began this witch hunt with, because they started from a faulty point and don't even know who they were accusing

---

Another irrelevant circle, so lets try this another way.

T = 10 + A, where T is total number of people at the parties, 10 represents the people anonymous is charging, and A represents the number of additional people at the parties that anonymous isnt going after. According to you, A should be 0 because they were charging everyone at the party. Also according to you, you believe T > 10.

So lets say there were 100 total people at the parties. According to you, that means 100 = 10 + 0.

Please explain how you came to the above conclusion.

quote:

---

*ETA: if you go re-watch the first video, the group claims to be getting information on all of the football team, all the administrators, and the parents of the alleged perpretrators

---

After re watching the video, he specifically says a list of men named in the preliminary doc who took part in the kidnapping and rape of a 15 year old girl. Not a list of everyone at the party, a list of the men who took part.

So tell me, again, where you got that he was accusing everyone who was AT THE PARTY.