- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One of Ohio's best HS football teams/town going to be all over the news
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:41 am to Open Your Eyes
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:41 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
So what you're saying is he did, in fact, have a chance to defend himself.
being presumed guilty and then having to turn over private documentation to a person with no legitimate reason to assume your guilt is not defending yourself as much as trying to survive a witch hunt. the motherfricker even apologized...when he wasn't even there
quote:
If this kid was facing trial as an accessory to rape, are you saying he wouldn't have supplied his phone records to prove his innocence or something?
the police would have gone to a judge to get a warrant with their PC to get the information necessary to even charge him, and he would have never been charged because he wouldn't have been in a kangaroo court like what anon is running
quote:
There is still record of their arrest and charges. Record that will come up much quicker in future background checks than the current situation.
in most states if you're found not guilty you can expunge the arrest/charge. this kid can't, and he made national news
quote:
And they did it because he fell in line with the evidence they were using against others at the time. Once again, anonymous is sounding a lot like law enforcement.
except law enforcement relies on actual evidence with set standards
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
being presumed guilty and then having to turn over private documentation to a person with no legitimate reason to assume your guilt is not defending yourself as much as trying to survive a witch hunt. the motherfricker even apologized...when he wasn't even there
And around and around in circles you go. If the kid did not have a chance to defend himself, then how did he defend himself?
quote:
the police would have gone to a judge to get a warrant with their PC to get the information necessary to even charge him, and he would have never been charged because he wouldn't have been in a kangaroo court like what anon is running
Another irrelevant circle. In the comparison to the criminal justice you are supposedly doing, this case is already passed the investigation and evidence gathering part and onto the actual trial. So once again, at his actual trial where he was wrongfully accused, would he not have used cell phone records to prove his innocence? And if not, then what is your point?
And also, are you saying that even with a warrant obtained from a judge through probable cause, the police have never wrongfully charged someone based on incorrect evidence? And if not, then what is your point?
quote:
in most states if you're found not guilty you can expunge the arrest/charge. this kid can't, and he made national news
So the arrest/charge will still show up in a background check, just as expunged.
And I'll ask again, what national news has this kid's name gown up in? Where is his name in the NYT article?
quote:
except law enforcement relies on actual evidence with set standards
So that actual evidence with set standards that law enforcement obtains is never planted, falsified, incorrect, incomplete, etc., right?
Posted on 12/29/12 at 11:15 am to SlowFlowPro
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News