Started By
Message

re: England and WC 2014

Posted on 12/21/12 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28615 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 4:25 pm to
I don't know what kind of magical answer you are looking for. This thread is full of information answering your question. We have detailed why English teams haven't succeeded in the past, how the current generation is different, how the current generation can be better, the effect certain players can have on the squad AND have given you a list of 35+ players who can play a role in the near future. What else are you looking for?
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 4:41 pm to
Man it sounds like I will just never be satisfied.

Well, I never got any real meaningful opposition other than Wilshere and Cleverley, which I disagreed with, and that's fine.

quote:

AND have given you a list of 35+ players who can play a role in the near future.


yeah but most of those guys are very young, past their prime, or suck cock. One thing that's hard to discount is that virtually all of the best English players play in the EPL in any given year. And the best EPL strikers, CMs, etc. are internationalers. England may have a very solid backline, but so does France, whom you laughed at.
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 4:42 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram