Started By
Message

re: 1908 National Champions

Posted on 12/11/12 at 10:56 am to
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 12/11/12 at 10:56 am to
LSU could legitimately claim it if it wanted to.

Pretty much all titles before 1936 are retroactive. There was no such thing as the concept of "national champion" in the early days.

Hell, before 1906 the rules weren't even standardized, differnet areas of the country and different schools played with different rules.

Basically the older you go back, the harder it is to really see who was the best team that year, so it's not uncommon to have split claims and nobody would really dispute it.

FYI, the oldest title Bama claims is from 1925, a team that went 10-0 and won the Rose Bowl, so ya.

There's only one BS title Alabama claims and that's 1941, it's the only post 1936 title they claim not awarded by one of the major polls (AP or Coahes).

Keep telling yourself whatever you want, no matter how you count the titles Alabama either has the most or is tied with Notre Dame for the most. Of the 14 Alabama claims 13 of them are acknowledged consensusly, with only the bogus 1941 claim not being so.
This post was edited on 12/11/12 at 10:59 am
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
18476 posts
Posted on 12/11/12 at 11:00 am to
hey can someone tell me if Jim Thorpe played for Carlisle?
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 7:48 am to
quote:

There's only one BS Title Bama claims and that's 1941


bullshite, I was in Tulane Stadium New Years Eve in 1973 and saw #1 Bama LOSE to #2 Notre Dame, 24-23, yet because UPI didn't do a poll after Bowl Games, Bama claims it.
THIS is a BS NC.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram