Started By
Message

re: Evidence Strongly Suggesting Alabama Officiating Bias

Posted on 12/4/12 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 12/4/12 at 2:28 pm to
Hope you don't mind, but I'm gonna dump this here too. This breaks it down a little differently.



As you stated, it doesn't seem to matter who the coach is, what the team's record is, etc. BAMA gets penalized less BY FAR than LSU.
Posted by Tiger 1964
Tampa
Member since Mar 2007
163 posts
Posted on 12/4/12 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

As you stated, it doesn't seem to matter who the coach is, what the team's record is, etc. BAMA gets penalized less BY FAR than LSU.


Actually, it goes farther than this. If you look prior to 2002 at BOTH Alabama and Auburn, their penalties are similar to the rest of the SEC teams. Begining in 2002, both of these teams' penalties nosedive as compared to the rest of the SEC. Guess who arrived in 2002...none other than Mike Slive. Since then Alabama and Auburn have consistantly had fewer penalties than all of the other SEC teams. This is almost statistically impossible. We all see the holds...they just don't get called...why not?...the head of the SEC does not want them to be called.

Would be really be interesting to follow the money trail for some of these SEC office folks and referees.all all
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram