Started By
Message

re: Charges Dropped against Minnesota State HC on child porn

Posted on 12/1/12 at 9:49 am to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59286 posts
Posted on 12/1/12 at 9:49 am to
quote:

I'm not the type to throw lawsuits around but I think I'd definitely be taking somebody to court for that. His name was sullied because he had bathtime videos of his kids. Countless number of parents have done this. Sucks for Hoffner.


Lawsuits are not the answer. The laws need to be changed. This is what happens when we pass laws to "get tough" in response to some terrible incident. Probably some high profile case somewhere about child porn and we rush to pass tougher laws without considering the unintended consequences like some guy with picks of his kids in a bath or teenagers being charged with child porn.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14555 posts
Posted on 12/1/12 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Lawsuits are not the answer. The laws need to be changed. This is what happens when we pass laws to "get tough" in response to some terrible incident. Probably some high profile case somewhere about child porn and we rush to pass tougher laws without considering the unintended consequences like some guy with picks of his kids in a bath or teenagers being charged with child porn.


But then, when you "loosen up", actual ped's can escape through loopholes. Why can't the toughness remain but the law enforcers use a little common sense?

Shortly after he was arrested, someone had to start realizing that this was a mistake. How about you expedite the frick out of the legal process and give this innocent man back his life?
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31128 posts
Posted on 12/11/12 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Lawsuits are not the answer. The laws need to be changed. This is what happens when we pass laws to "get tough" in response to some terrible incident. Probably some high profile case somewhere about child porn and we rush to pass tougher laws without considering the unintended consequences like some guy with picks of his kids in a bath or teenagers being charged with child porn.


Interestingly enough, toughening of laws may end up helping future criminals of that crime.

For example, a city has a major narcotics distribution problem that has the public and the media up in arms. Therefore, laws are put in place to enforce mandatory sentencing of the harshest possible penalty that is within the legislature's range for a fair and proportional punishment.

In turn, the mandatory sentencing forces hundreds of new cases to go to court and backs up the docket. Since the prosecution and judges cannot handle the load, DA's may choose to prosecute the criminals on a lesser crime, such as possession, instead of distribution, so they can plea bargain away the case. Of course, the DA has to start on lower ground in the plea bargaining because possession does not carry the same penalty.

Ironically, the "get tough on crime" laws can backfire. Rushing to judgment and irrational decision-making is never the answer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram