- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU commits on Rivals that are 3 Stars to move up...
Posted on 11/12/12 at 1:40 pm to Tigerrotti
Posted on 11/12/12 at 1:40 pm to Tigerrotti
Lewis Neal reminds me of Melvin Ingram from USCe last year. A utility DL that is a bit undersized and wont blow the world away at the combine, but has brute strength and motor that just wont stop. he should be a 4* and have been kinda shocked he hasnt moved up.
Melvin Jones is 1 of the best athletes in the nation. I dont care that hes a 3*. Last season as a QB he ran 94 times for 1,208yards with 14 TDs. On D, he had 140 tackles. Before he got hurt this season he ran 67 times for 861yards and 13 TDs with 78 tackles and 11 for loss. IMPRESSIVE
Melvin Jones is 1 of the best athletes in the nation. I dont care that hes a 3*. Last season as a QB he ran 94 times for 1,208yards with 14 TDs. On D, he had 140 tackles. Before he got hurt this season he ran 67 times for 861yards and 13 TDs with 78 tackles and 11 for loss. IMPRESSIVE
This post was edited on 11/12/12 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 11/12/12 at 2:24 pm to CalTiger
quote:
In which case -
1. If the sites are capable of doing the same evaluation and don't see it in Neal - then he is only a good but not great player and can't be given a high ranking.
2. If the coaches can see it and the sites can't or don't then he could be a great player but won't get it since they don't see it and he won't be given a high ranking.
Is this reasoning right?
Both of those sound reasonable.
Its important to note that even good coaches...guys that get paid lots of money to do nothing more than evaluate prospects...often disagree over just how good a player can be.
For me, I can understand why Neal is a 5.7 3-star. I'm not outraged. It is a safe rating; right on that bubble between a solid good and very good prospect. Factors that Neal cannot change are what is keeping his rating from going higher; he can't help that he is not tall, or that he can't run fast, or that he can't get bigger because there is no more room to add weight to his frame.
Still, what impresses coaches that watch him are just how sound he is: how he always keeps containment through outstanding positioning and vision; how he keeps from being wired to the blocker by using his hands and arms; how strong he looks; how good his instincts are; how he is a superior tackler.
LSU and other schools like Ohio State offer many 3-stars every year. Many of them become good players, some become great players, and some become supportive depth. I think Neal does enough things well to make me happy that he is in this class but I also understand how he is not viewed as a "can't miss" prospect.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News