- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Interesting discussion about the LSU vs Bama Again ESPN article
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:30 pm to thelsutigerfan
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:30 pm to thelsutigerfan
Get ready guys. This is the third similar article just in the last two days, way before LSU and Bama even meet for the first time. They are laying the groundwork for Mulligan II (if Bama loses in Nov., of course) so it won't seem so surprising if/when announced later. "Eyeball tests" and "best losses" criteria will be soon to follow.
1
Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:37 pm to Thunder Tiger
quote:
Get ready guys. This is the third similar article just in the last two days, way before LSU and Bama even meet for the first time. They are laying the groundwork for Mulligan II (if Bama loses in Nov., of course) so it won't seem so surprising if/when announced later. "Eyeball tests" and "best losses" criteria will be soon to follow.
Yet when posters like myself stated Mulligan I would be bad for CFB, I was called a kook for even suggesting Mulligan II could happen.
Make no mistake about it, IF LSU wins on 11/3, this will be pushed if no other media darling is unbeaten.
Again, as I've stated a million times before here:
LSU's new standard now is beating Bama twice in a season, while they only need to beat us once.
The CFB regular season is already irrelevant. 2011 did this...not 2014.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News