- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do civilians own "assault weapons"?
Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:22 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:22 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Sound suppressors eh? I'm sure you were being funny but they have earplugs and muffs for that. But I agree we should be allowed silencers. What business of the government is that? And while I don't the automatic weapons are necessary and are not effective in a militia situation, why can't we have them? Where is this invisible line? I want a fricking flame thrower. In a short blast it painfully kills attackers with minimal property damage. The government gets 40% of money to pay for the others. I pay that price for the liberties afforded by our Constitution. They can eat a dick with the particulars.
Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:38 pm to pooponsaban
quote:
I'm sure you were being funny but they have earplugs and muffs for that.
Did you even read my post
Additionally, the earplugs and muffs can only help so much. Suppressors can reduce the decibel level far below the protection level earplugs offer.
quote:
What business of the government is that?
I don't have a problem with them knowing I have a suppressor. They already know I have guns.
quote:
And while I don't the automatic weapons are necessary and are not effective in a militia situation, why can't we have them?
Huh?
You can have them.
quote:
Where is this invisible line?
Well, I don't think civilians should be allowed to have militarized tanks or jets for obvious reasons.
quote:
I want a fricking flame thrower. In a short blast it painfully kills attackers with minimal property damage.
trolling I hope, I don't know the law on flame throwers but they are extremely dangerous to the operator.
quote:
The government gets 40% of money to pay for the others. I pay that price for the liberties afforded by our Constitution. They can eat a dick with the particulars.
okay
Posted on 7/21/12 at 4:40 pm to pooponsaban
ok I'm wondering if my hot .45 acp reloads would have gone through his armor?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News