Started By
Message

re: How meaningful are STARS? Player evaluations

Posted on 6/12/12 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by BigZinMetry
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2012
31 posts
Posted on 6/12/12 at 12:29 pm to
I'm not saying that these recruiting sites are a the bible for player analysis, all I'm saying is that we shouldn't care if ALA is ranked #2 in recruiting and we're #6. It seems that many get caught up in where LSU is ranked recruiting wise in comparisons with ALA. I believe that Frank Wilson know what hes doing and we should leave it at that. I only use rivals and scout mainly to get an idea of their size and to watch their film. Very rarely do I come across a guy who has a really good highlight tape, decent size, and locate somewhat locally that doesn't have an LSU offer. We are consistently one of the best player evaluators in the country year in and year out, so I tend to trust Wilson's analysis more so than rivals.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59286 posts
Posted on 6/12/12 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

all I'm saying is that we shouldn't care if ALA is ranked #2 in recruiting and we're #6


That i agree with. There's usually not a significant difference from say #2 to #6. As long as you are consistently recruiting good players, your classes will be ranked in the top 5-10, that's all that matters. Worring about spots like that is like arguing over the hottest chick in the swimsuit issue.

quote:

believe that Frank Wilson know what hes doing and we should leave it at that.


I agree and he will be all over guys that are 4-5 stars in La. A lot of times the player rankings and stars are affected by who is recruiting a player.
This post was edited on 6/12/12 at 1:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram