re: bradley won that fight

I'm a grown man, so i'm not into the namecalling because it's easy to sit behind a computer and call a man an idiot without having to face the consequences of doing so. However I will argue my point with merit.

I had Bradley winning Rds 1,2,9,10,11,12. That's six rounds. I had Pac winning 3,4,5,6,7,8. That's six rounds which would equal my 114-114 draw. In rounds 3-8 PAC did dominate Bradley....it is also the meat of the fight with most people viewing. At the end of the eigth PAC shoulda been up 6-2. In the minds of many folks Pac should have already won the fight because he throughly won those rounds. However, if you just look at the last four rounds of the fight PAC did nothing in the first 2 minutes (except the 11th when he did nothing at all) and rallied at the end with flurries and most of the punches didnt even land.

PAC left a lot on the table. If he would have pressed the issue in the end of the fight he would have won by a wide margin. He took rounds off, and put the fight in the hands of the judges.

What's your arguement instead of claiming for a fix that you said was "clearly on" (a fix you have yet to offer proof of...or as we say on TD Link?)

quote:

---

PAC dominated that fight

---

Yeah he did if each round was only 40 seconds. But their are 3 minute rounds. And he was inactive and uneffective for 80% of it. It's not trolling if its true. Pac gave the fight away. Watch the fight again objectively and you could see that too. You cant discount Bradley's jab, counter punching and body work just because he doesnt have any power and it wasnt flashy. Points are points, it doesnt matter how soft or hard the punch comes.