Started By
Message

re: Interesting question from Rabalais: After 2006 Final Four, what happened?

Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:23 am to
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71964 posts
Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:23 am to
quote:

A six game improvement in the win column is impossible with what we had coming back.



After losing the best player on the team you saw a 6 game improvement coming? Considering how players developed under Trent yet another big leap of faith you're making.
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:52 am to
quote:

After losing the best player on the team you saw a 6 game improvement coming?


Yes. I did. For you to act like it's impossible is idiotic. We weren't as bad as you make us out to be last year. I honestly believe going smaller would have helped this team. We were over-matched this year versus teams who had a hybrid power forward defensively.

Losing Hamilton hurts, but the day is dead for teams not named UK, UCLA, Duke, etc. for having two quality big men. Having a hybrid 3 is the way college basketball is moving. Coleman fits that bill perfectly.

Missouri this year is a perfect example of not having to have two true big-men to have success. They won 30 games.

Like I said, neither you nor I know whether or not we would have improved next year. We may have flopped. I don't know, but it's possible we would have been much improved next year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram