- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Interesting question from Rabalais: After 2006 Final Four, what happened?
Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:23 am to tuptiger
Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:23 am to tuptiger
quote:
A six game improvement in the win column is impossible with what we had coming back.
After losing the best player on the team you saw a 6 game improvement coming? Considering how players developed under Trent yet another big leap of faith you're making.
Posted on 4/13/12 at 12:52 am to saintsfan22
quote:
After losing the best player on the team you saw a 6 game improvement coming?
Yes. I did. For you to act like it's impossible is idiotic. We weren't as bad as you make us out to be last year. I honestly believe going smaller would have helped this team. We were over-matched this year versus teams who had a hybrid power forward defensively.
Losing Hamilton hurts, but the day is dead for teams not named UK, UCLA, Duke, etc. for having two quality big men. Having a hybrid 3 is the way college basketball is moving. Coleman fits that bill perfectly.
Missouri this year is a perfect example of not having to have two true big-men to have success. They won 30 games.
Like I said, neither you nor I know whether or not we would have improved next year. We may have flopped. I don't know, but it's possible we would have been much improved next year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News