- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/10/12 at 7:33 pm to aswemajor
Doesn't the law of averages and gamblers fallacy go against each other?
If so, the gamblers fallacy makes much more sense (I.e. the ball lands on black 20 times in a row, people say the law of averages has to come into play soon and start hitting red, but in reality, there is a 50/50 shot every single time...well not quite if you include the green)
If so, the gamblers fallacy makes much more sense (I.e. the ball lands on black 20 times in a row, people say the law of averages has to come into play soon and start hitting red, but in reality, there is a 50/50 shot every single time...well not quite if you include the green)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News