Started By
Message

re: Act of Valor

Posted on 2/23/12 at 11:40 am to
Posted by beHop
Landmass
Member since Jan 2012
14539 posts
Posted on 2/23/12 at 11:40 am to
GTFO


and they used live ammunition because they can, and no one is going to tell them no. Unlike Charlie Sheen, they are actually qualified to handle the equipment (ammo included.)

and yes, I know you were joking. Not flaming...
This post was edited on 2/23/12 at 11:42 am
Posted by 4nmylifetime
668 Neighbor to the Beast
Member since Jun 2009
2844 posts
Posted on 2/23/12 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Unlike Charlie Sheen, they are actually qualified to handle the equipment (ammo included.)


...and qualified to be actors as well.

Sorry beHop I couldnt help it. Yes I am just joking around. There is nothing wrong with a good shoot 'em up movie.
Posted by Geauxldineye
New Orleans, La
Member since Sep 2005
1345 posts
Posted on 2/23/12 at 11:57 am to
Roger Ebert just put up his review of this. Gave it 2 1/2 stars. Basically it was made as a recruitment film. It plays out as such. Mostly action, very little plot. I would rather see "Hell and Back Again"

quote:

"Act of Valor" is gift-wrapped in patriotism. It was once intended as a recruitment film, and that's how it plays. The action scenes are harrowing but exciting. Lots of explosions and special effects. At the end, there is a full-dress military funeral, honoring three generations of warriors. The real action scenes in "Hell and Back Again" don't play like an action movie. I don't recall seeing a single Taliban fighter. One of Sgt. Harris' men is killed on the first day in the field. Harris is wounded late in his tour. Nobody saw either one of the snipers.


link to review
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram