- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saban is making us quit
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:48 am to secfan123
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:48 am to secfan123
quote:
No it wasnt. In fact, the formula was followed exactly as the bcs intended it to be. The top two teams made it in.
And the way they always got to the two top teams was by looking at the whole season. The body of work. Since the season usually matters in college football. And conf championships were never required but were considered. And rematches were frowned upon. Ex: 2006 Michigan, 2007 UGA.
And then came this year, when eyeball tests and defensive stats and quality losses were used to justify a rematch for a division runner-up. No previous one-loss Big12 champ had ever been excluded in favor of a division runner-up. The standards, the arguments, the reasoning were all changed for this one year, for this one team.
3
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:52 am to biglego
quote:
And the way they always got to the two top teams was by looking at the whole season. The body of work. Since the season usually matters in college football. And conf championships were never required but were considered. And rematches were frowned upon. Ex: 2006 Michigan, 2007 UGA.
Who's "they"? The Illuminati? The Martians? Masons? The voters voted. I didn't know they secretly loved alabama. Or did they secretly change the computer formula used?
quote:
And then came this year, when eyeball tests and defensive stats and quality losses were used to justify a rematch for a division runner-up. No previous one-loss Big12 champ had ever been excluded in favor of a division runner-up. The standards, the arguments, the reasoning were all changed for this one year, for this one team.
whose reasoning, genius? Its not a single "consciousness" doing this reasoning. ITs a shitload of individuals voting, combined with a computer formula in a previously agreed upon fashion.
Im sorry we forgot to use lube though.
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:52 am to biglego
I think you're mad
21-0
21-0
This post was edited on 1/13/12 at 1:53 am
Posted on 1/13/12 at 1:54 am to biglego
The BCS spoke, as every team agreed before the season, the game was set, and one team dominated the other.. any complaints are moot, except those against the preparation and execution of the team you rooted for...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News