Started By
Message

re: Sure Wish LSU Was Playing Stanford or OSU

Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:51 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263354 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

Please...that's the kind of thinking that kept them out of the title game.


Evidently, the majority of people who follow college football for a living and vote on this stuff thought so as well.

quote:


What is an elite team? Their defensive numbers are crappy, but that can be attributed to a number of factors relating to their offense.


No, their defense is shitty. Very shitty.
quote:



Don't you think them being sent to the Fiesta Bowl might have taken some wind out of their sails? Though, with this being their first BCS game ever would have had them excited regardless.


They don't look any worse than they have all year. This is just the best team they have faced.

quote:

Bottom line: I think they had done more this season than Alabama to deserve a shot. Alabama got rewarded for having the number one team in the country in the same division.


Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama
This post was edited on 1/2/12 at 10:55 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76843 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama

Okie's schedule was better than Bama's. They have a crppy defense but a good offense. Okie is probably comparable to Ark, and Bama is probably much better, i agree with u. But in every other year teams are judged by their body of work. Not by eye tests or defensive stats. Which is a good thing bc lsu probably fails the eyeball test in 2007. Georgia and USC were both looking better.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24185 posts
Posted on 1/3/12 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Evidently, the majority of people who follow college football for a living and vote on this stuff thought so as well.

Right, because of that preconceived notion of them "not being elite" or "not passing the eyeball test."

quote:

No, their defense is shitty. Very shitty.

Yeah, it is obvious that they couldn't stop a runny nose last night, but who can? Ha ha. I was meaning, though, that their defensive numbers are skewed a bit by the fact that they are out there so much of the game due to the speed at which their offense scores.

quote:

They don't look any worse than they have all year. This is just the best team they have faced.


They handled OU pretty well to end the season, and so far it looks as though most of their opponents that were in bowls have won so far. (Granted that Iowa State loss looks even worse now.)

quote:

Played worse competition, have a crappy defense, lost to Iowa State. Bama and LSU are in a league by themselves. Bottom line, OSU is closer to Arkansas in quality than it is LSU or Bama


the Big XII is doing pretty good in bowl games so far. Who did Alabama beat that was any better than the teams OSU beat? How many teams with winning records had Alabama beaten before bowl games?

Alabama had a better out of conference opponent (on paper), but how does that look now with Penn State losing to Houston?

I'm not saying OSU could beat LSU or 'Bama. They just got screwed in the media because they aren't perceived to be elite, and have just moved from the "kid table" of college football to the "adult table." They are a conference champion with one loss, and if they were the Oklahoma team from Norman with that resume' the would have been in the title game.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram