- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How much better would a Swarovski Z3 4-12x50 be than my current...
Posted on 12/21/11 at 9:46 pm to HebertFest08
Posted on 12/21/11 at 9:46 pm to HebertFest08
Oh and just to throw it out there...... Schmidt & Bender is better than all of them.
S & B
Swarovski
Zeiss
Leupold
Nikon
Burris
Thats ranked with apples to apples.... 1" tubes and 30mm tubes. S &B doesnt have a 1" though i think. been a while since ive dealt with them.
S & B
Swarovski
Zeiss
Leupold
Nikon
Burris
Thats ranked with apples to apples.... 1" tubes and 30mm tubes. S &B doesnt have a 1" though i think. been a while since ive dealt with them.
2
Posted on 12/21/11 at 10:06 pm to HebertFest08
quote:
When you compared the scopes where they in a store?
I compared the Zeiss and Nikon this afternoon in the field.
quote:
Oh and just to throw it out there...... Schmidt & Bender is better than all of them.
A quick look on Optics Planet says not in my price range... I'm willing to spend the 1000-1100 that the Swarovski will cost, but the 3-12x50 S&B looks to be about 2500. Ha, maybe next time.
Posted on 12/21/11 at 10:32 pm to HebertFest08
Schmidt and bender is without peer. I have Ziess, Swarovski and S&B and the Schmidt's are in a class by themselves. Very, very expensive unfortunately. I would trade all the others for a S&B
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News