Started By
Message

re: "Tough to beat a team twice"

Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:57 am to
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8582 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 12:57 am to
I have never understood that logic. The results of the first game have nothing to do with the second.
Posted by bigeztiger
Columbus Ohio
Member since Jul 2011
5092 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 5:29 am to
quote:

The results of the first game have nothing to do with the second.


I disagree... I think our guys are extra confident because they already won... and bama players are gunna be pissed cuz they lost at home
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 12/21/11 at 7:54 am to
It is true.
...not as much with bad teams or when there is a big discrepancy in talent or ability
But when both teams are solid and close to each other,it places the first winner at a disadvantage.

why:
a great team may have limited number of weaknesses, so at the first game, they are exposed...by the second game, they are gone or limited.
while this is true of both teams, it affects (benefits) the losing team more.


the only way to win again is usually to be able to exploit a different weakness if one is found.
This post was edited on 12/21/11 at 7:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram