Started By
Message

re: Nothing wrong with the idea of a split title

Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:05 am to
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10457 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:05 am to
quote:

One of our arguments in 03 and 07 when referring to the teams that didn't get it was "You agreed on the system at the beginning of the year, now you have to live with it." The same applies to us now. If Alabama beats us, Alabama is champion. The only champion.
The system we agreed to does not (and did not in 2003) require the AP to vote the BCSCG winner #1.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52605 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:

The system we agreed to does not (and did not in 2003) require the AP to vote the BCSCG winner #1.
which makes the AP an isolated entity and unworthy of recognition

we play for the crystal football
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17683 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:

The system we agreed to does not (and did not in 2003) require the AP to vote the BCSCG winner #1.

Ok fine. But we didn't want to acknowledge it then, so why acknowledge it now? If the AP vote was not credible in 2003, then you can't all of a sudden decide that they know what they're talking about now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram