- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The way the voters should view the Alabama rematch situation
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:13 pm to BleedPurpleGold
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:13 pm to BleedPurpleGold
quote:
No we do not. You're interpretation is citing the means to the end as the ultimate end. Mine is not.
The object of the BCS is to decide which team is the best in college football and do it fairly. It does that by ranking teams, and the two best are to face off on the field (now wait for it...)
TO DECIDE WHO IS BEST
That's happened already between Alabama and LSU. Give someone else a chance.
So if I understand you correctly, if two teams met in the regular season, they shouldn't play each other in the BCSNCG?
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:15 pm to MStreetTiger
quote:
So if I understand you correctly, if two teams met in the regular season, they shouldn't play each other in the BCSNCG?
Jesus Christ. Don't be so naive.
Posted on 11/26/11 at 11:22 pm to MStreetTiger
quote:
So if I understand you correctly, if two teams met in the regular season, they shouldn't play each other in the BCSNCG?
He's right. At least with 2 teams from the same conference. tOSU and Michigan were #1 and #2 in the regular season when they played each other in the last game of the season.
There was no rematch a month later in the BCS NG. The voters took another team that was doing great (Florida) and put them in the BCS NG.
This post was edited on 11/26/11 at 11:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News