- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Getting paid "under-the-table"
Posted on 11/23/11 at 10:56 am to Cold Cous Cous
Posted on 11/23/11 at 10:56 am to Cold Cous Cous
quote:
because the income tax is, to a large extent, self-reported.
Are you referring to the OP or to the average taxpayer?
quote:
The argument about the toddler is a red herring. I have no idea what you're talking about, but I assume it has something to do with a risk that helping the toddler would get you in trouble with the secret police or something. Obviously moral values are not some absolute trump card that overrides every other potential incentive, and the risk of getting in trouble with the Party is a serious incentive indeed. But those moral values are part of the equation, more, I think, than you're giving them credit for.
It's not a red herring - it's exactly applicable. It's very easy to morally grandstand when the cost of being "immoral" is very high (in some cases in this country you can make money off the "moral" action as you can perhaps cash in on 15 minutes of Good Samaritan fame).
What you are saying is more true for acts inflicted directly on specific individuals. And I mostly agree with you. But not paying taxes is viewed in a different light by most people because the "victim" is much more nebulous than one guy who had his money stolen from him. That's why the Madoff example isn't comparable to even the shoplifting example that was proffered.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News