re: City lost £195 Million in 2010-2011

quote:

---

shite, you want to talk about overinflated prices? Someone needs to publish a pointless article about Anzi's spending.

---

A pointless article? Or an article on Anzi's pointless spending? Who have they spent excessive money on? They overpaid slightly for Dzsudzsak, they paid less for Zhirkov than Chelsea paid for him, and paid probably what is a reasonable price to attract one of the world's best strikers. That's not the best example.

Even in football clubs owned by Arab oil money, City's spending seems excessive. However, City's goal was to quickly catch United, which they have done.

quote:

---

If city hadn't bought aguero someone else would've at a very similar cost

---

Who? You realize there is a recession in Europe right now. The Italian teams don't have the spending power they once did, Aguero couldn't go to Real, Barca don't have the money to buy Fabregas and another star player, none of the German teams could afford him. PSG could afford him, but they already bought Pastore. The only other team that could have feasibly afforded Aguero this summer was Chelsea, and they probably wouldn't go after him because they overpaid for an overrated striker earlier this year.