- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why would Gumpland get a rematch???
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:59 pm
we beat them on their home turf straight up and if the chips fall they would get a rematch. On top of that they wouldn't even have to play in the sec championship game.I think another one lose team that actually plays a championship game should get the opportunity aka stanford if they win their championship game. I think we beat bama if we play them again but just doesnt seem right having to play a team again
This post was edited on 11/8/11 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:01 pm to FLObserver
Oregon should get a rematch before Alabama.
Oregon has a tougher schedule and would be conference champions.
Oregon has a tougher schedule and would be conference champions.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:02 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
Oregon should get a rematch before Alabama.
Oregon has a tougher schedule and would be conference champions.
no they shouldn't.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:04 pm to JBeam
We all know the BCSNC isn't about what should happen, its about what the voters want to have happen. I think they are done with Alabama this year. No frucking way bama beats LSU in the dome. It would just never happen. They are gonna put another one of the top 5's to play LSU in the NC game.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:05 pm to JBeam
Bama is unlikely to leap another one-loss team with a conference championship. If LSU wins out, it won't matter. Gumps to the Sugar; Tigers to the title game.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:06 pm to FLObserver
A couple of things:
1. GERMANS
2. Stanford has terrible strength of schedule. Alabama plays an SEC schedule.
3. You cannot tell me you actually think Stanford, OK State, Boise, or even Oregon are better than Alabama.
4. Playing them again would be terrifying for us and boring for the rest of the country, but that's not the point. The point is that the two top teams play each other. Sounds like Socialism when you say; "I think another one lose team that actually plays a championship game should get the opportunity" The Pac 12 is garbage.
1. GERMANS
2. Stanford has terrible strength of schedule. Alabama plays an SEC schedule.
3. You cannot tell me you actually think Stanford, OK State, Boise, or even Oregon are better than Alabama.
4. Playing them again would be terrifying for us and boring for the rest of the country, but that's not the point. The point is that the two top teams play each other. Sounds like Socialism when you say; "I think another one lose team that actually plays a championship game should get the opportunity" The Pac 12 is garbage.
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:11 pm to FLObserver
B/C they are the second best team in the country?
I don't think the voters will put them there, but they will have a legit gripe, if not.
I don't think the voters will put them there, but they will have a legit gripe, if not.
This post was edited on 11/8/11 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 11/8/11 at 4:13 pm to DeathValleyHobo
quote:
3. You cannot tell me you actually think Stanford, OK State, Boise, or even Oregon are better than Alabama.
Who cares who is better? Bama had their shot at home. A 1 loss conference winner Gets in over bama.
Popular
Back to top
5







