Started By
Message

re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:48 am to
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27433 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:48 am to
quote:

Mississippi makes more in football revenue than you, ha.






So Arkansas has a bigger athletic budget than Mizzou.

Mizzou will obviously close that gap over the next few years.

So now that we have established UA has a larger athletic budget.

Why has Mizzou had similar success to Arkansas over the last 5 years in football? Does this mean that Arkansas is underachieving? Mizzou overachieving?


You are avoiding the actual competition on the field by trying to prove that Arkansas is superior because they have a larger budget and superior facilities, I am saying you don't based on what occurs on the field of play.

The fact is, Mizzou and Arkansas are very similar over the last 5 years on the gridiron.
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Mizzou will obviously close that gap over the next few years.



No, it will slightly widen.

Arkansas travel costs decrease while Missouri travel costs increase.

Arkansas was underachieving while Mizzou was overachieving. Missouri's roster is loaded with Texas talent and played many games in a conference with multiple Texas teams. we will see if that continues with only having 1 Texas team to play.

I did not dodge any question.

Arkansas went to the BCS last year and Mizzou has never done that in the BCS era (1998-today) Pinkle has done a great job of taking Missouri and relying heavily on Texas kids to fill his roster and having success.

Are you now expecting Missouri to have the same success in a harder league with less Texas Teams?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram