Started By
Message

re: A question for the BCS savvy people out there

Posted on 11/7/11 at 5:07 pm to
Posted by txtiger21
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2010
304 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 5:07 pm to
I have never understood why they put that rule in there. We would have to lose the SEC CG and then play bama in the NCG for this rule to take effect then the SEC champ would be in the sugar.

That would never happen
Posted by TriumphTiger
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Sep 2007
10187 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

I have never understood why they put that rule in there. We would have to lose the SEC CG and then play bama in the NCG for this rule to take effect then the SEC champ would be in the sugar. That would never happen


Imagine that Arky beats LSU and Bama goes to the SECCG as the highest BCS team, but Arky ends up #2 and LSU falls to #3. Then, Bams loses to UGA.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4058 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 6:29 am to
quote:

I have never understood why they put that rule in there. We would have to lose the SEC CG and then play bama in the NCG for this rule to take effect then the SEC champ would be in the sugar.

They want to insure that the conf champ goes to a BCS bowl. Like 2007 when we went with 2 losses, it is extremely unlikely, but it is possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram