Started By
Message

re: Better 1st SEC Season? A&M or Mizzou?

Posted on 10/24/11 at 11:23 am to
Posted by StrickAggie06
College Station
Member since Sep 2011
597 posts
Posted on 10/24/11 at 11:23 am to
The problem is that you are exaggerating my statements. When I said we are loaded at QB, obviously I meant talent wise since none of them could have any significant amount of experience. We have a very good QB coach, as evidenced by how well Tannehill was able to step in mid season last year, and I was inferring that our starter next season should fare reasonably well. Your insistence that we are guarenteed to lose at MSU just because we have a new starter at QB has far less facts to back it up than anything I have claimed.

As far as our OL goes, I said top 5. I did not say it WOULD be the #1, I said it COULD be. Obviously lsu and bama both have outstanding lines and its very possible they could be #1 and #2 next year with us elsewhere in the top 5. Before this past Sat, we were tied 3rd for fewest sacks allowed at 3 and are averaging well over 200 yds per game on the ground. Given how young the OL, it is pretty reasonable to assume they will be one of the best next season.
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 10/24/11 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Your insistence that we are guarenteed to lose at MSU just because we have a new starter at QB has far less facts to back it up than anything I have claimed.


I said MSU will be a coin flip. You WILL lose to Bama, Arky, and LSU no matter the field. Auburn will be dependent on location and whether or not Malzahn leaves them for a HC gig. If I had to put money on it right now, it's Auburn. You are going to lose to an East team unless you somehow draw Vandy and Kentucky out of the hat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram