- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better 1st SEC Season? A&M or Mizzou?
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:53 pm to theenemy
Posted on 10/21/11 at 7:53 pm to theenemy
quote:
Aggies lose alot of starters and will strugle in conference play.
Offensively, we should be fine. We lose Cyrus, Tannehill and Fuller, but return our entire OL, Micheal, and the rest of our WRs. As long as we get decent QB play, we will score points.
Defensively, we lose our top 2 CBs, and most of the DL. However, if we get the JUCO DL we are going after and get Mathis back after a medical redshirt, we should be fine there. We also have potentially solid JUCO fill ins at CB and ILB, and should have decent depth at both positions.
We won't be a perfect team by any means, but I think we will do a lot better than most think, barring an absolutely ridiculous away schedule.
4
Posted on 10/21/11 at 8:07 pm to StrickAggie06
Maybe so
But I would bet on Mizzou the first year, but I would take ya'll over the long haul. Fwiw
But I would bet on Mizzou the first year, but I would take ya'll over the long haul. Fwiw
Posted on 10/21/11 at 8:46 pm to StrickAggie06
Sherman is also a liability vs Saban, Miles, Petrino and Chiz.
If aTm goes 3-5 you should be happy.
Of course Missou might not be much better.
If aTm goes 3-5 you should be happy.
Of course Missou might not be much better.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:26 am to StrickAggie06
Strick, you know that both Garrick Williams and Trent Hunter have, for all intents and purposes, lost their starting jobs, right?
That means 3 more starters return on defense assuming Jonathan Mathis gets a med RS.
Starting Defense next year will look like:
DE - Nealy
NT - Compton/Ennis/David
DE - Mathis
LB - Porter
LB - Stewart
LB - Jenkins
LB - Moore
CB - Harris
FS - Campbell
SS - Matthews
CB - Raven/Everett/Monroe/Blake
That means 3 more starters return on defense assuming Jonathan Mathis gets a med RS.
Starting Defense next year will look like:
DE - Nealy
NT - Compton/Ennis/David
DE - Mathis
LB - Porter
LB - Stewart
LB - Jenkins
LB - Moore
CB - Harris
FS - Campbell
SS - Matthews
CB - Raven/Everett/Monroe/Blake
Posted on 10/22/11 at 2:22 am to StrickAggie06
quote:
Offensively, we should be fine. We lose Cyrus, Tannehill and Fuller, but return our entire OL, Micheal, and the rest of our WRs. As long as we get decent QB play, we will score points.
Scoring points in the SEC isn't like scoring points in the Big 12. Keep in mind that Arky has one of the weaker defenses in the SEC. You will be lucky to avg 30 ppg without Tannehill
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News