- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

We all know it's hard to win in the SEC, but is it easier to be "good"?
Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 10/5/11 at 10:39 pm
All this talk about the recruiting advantages of being in the SEC got me thinking. I saw over on the Mizzou board they were talking about getting 4 and 5* which will frankly just never happen outside of a couple 4* (which every team in the SEC has). Is it still a recruiting advantage if said team struggles to win 4,5,6 games their first few years? Or is a disadvantage? Basically it's a matter of chicken or the egg IMO. I think all things considered, Mizzou and A&M don't gain much as far as recruiting from their move to the SEC.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 5:01 am to busey
What they have yet to understand is that in 2011 they would have ranked 10th (aTm) and 11th(Mizzou) in the SEC last year. Even with the slight bump they may get for going to the SEC, a few years of that and guess what happens?
ETA:According to Rivals Rankings for 2011
ETA:According to Rivals Rankings for 2011
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 5:02 am
Popular
Back to top
1





