- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why was Lee named starting QB over Mettenberger?
Posted on 8/28/11 at 6:02 pm to GeauxWarTigers
Posted on 8/28/11 at 6:02 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
Mett is still an unknown.
I'll give you that. But we do know that Lee is a below average QB that fails in just about every opportunity he has been given. I don't care how long he's been at LSU, he doesn't deserve to be a starter. Give Mettenberger the same opportunity Lee was given his freshman year.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 6:06 pm to TexanPete
quote:
I'll give you that. But we do know that Lee is a below average QB that fails in just about every opportunity he has been given. I don't care how long he's been at LSU, he doesn't deserve to be a starter. Give Mettenberger the same opportunity Lee was given his freshman year
When did he fail?
Why doesnt he deserve it?
I want you to help us all understand your line of thinking here.
Ive been accused by several here for having an agenda.. You take this to another level.
Posted on 8/28/11 at 6:34 pm to TexanPete
quote:
Give Mettenberger the same opportunity Lee was given his freshman year.
And turn this year into 2008 2.0 and Mett into Lee 2.0?
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)