- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What can DNA prove in this case?
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:26 am to tc5140
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:26 am to tc5140
It can shed light on the whole story. For instance, hypothetically JJ could have appeared at the interview with cuts on his hand which he explained as the result of football. If it is then established that his blood is at the scene it calls his whole story into question.
On the other hand, it could b powerful evidence if none of the blood at the scene belongs to JJ.
remember, Stone said they are looking for evidence to prove his guilt or innocence.
On the other hand, it could b powerful evidence if none of the blood at the scene belongs to JJ.
remember, Stone said they are looking for evidence to prove his guilt or innocence.
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:29 am to KCinDC
quote:
On the other hand, it could b powerful evidence if none of the blood at the scene belongs to JJ.
How?
Would you expect someone to bleed from kicking another person?
The DNA testing is a huge fricking stretch in the investigation of this case.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News