Started By
Message

re: What can DNA prove in this case?

Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:26 am to
Posted by KCinDC
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2007
1521 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:26 am to
It can shed light on the whole story. For instance, hypothetically JJ could have appeared at the interview with cuts on his hand which he explained as the result of football. If it is then established that his blood is at the scene it calls his whole story into question.

On the other hand, it could b powerful evidence if none of the blood at the scene belongs to JJ.

remember, Stone said they are looking for evidence to prove his guilt or innocence.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48517 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:29 am to
quote:

On the other hand, it could b powerful evidence if none of the blood at the scene belongs to JJ.


How?

Would you expect someone to bleed from kicking another person?

The DNA testing is a huge fricking stretch in the investigation of this case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram