In truth the Conferences are as follows, from any guy that really watches them all a lot:

1)SEC(but only by a very slim margin over #2)
2)PAC-12
3)Big Ten(+ 2)(because they cannot count)
4)Big 12(- 2) (because they cannot count)
5)MWC
6)WAC(has always been this way for a while but soon will drop below Conference USA with their best teams leaving
7)ACC(might make a resurgence, time will tell)
8)Big Least
9)Conference USA
10)The rest...

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by DocBugbear

Arlington, Texas

Member since Mar 2008

7999 posts

Posted on 8/7/11 at 1:31 am to DucksflyinPAC

I think you are slightly over-rating the PAC-12 and very much underestimating the ACC. They get a bad rap because they are light at the top, but on average they are pretty solid. ...And the only reason the Big X beats the Big 12 is because they added Nebraska.

This post was edited on 8/7/11 at 1:32 am

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Jumbeauxlaya

LSU

Member since Jan 2011

18083 posts

Posted on 8/7/11 at 9:06 am to DucksflyinPAC

quote:

1)SEC(but only by a very slim margin over #2)
2)PAC-12
3)Big Ten(+ 2)(because they cannot count)
4)Big 12(- 2) (because they cannot count)
5)MWC
6)WAC(has always been this way for a while but soon will drop below Conference USA with their best teams leaving
7)ACC(might make a resurgence, time will tell)
8)Big Least
9)Conference USA
10)The rest...

yep, such a slim margin, that's why the SEC has 7 of 13 BCS titles... and the PAC-whatever has an asterik and a loss.

Big 12 was the second best conference, now it's the Big 10.

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board