Also getting experience.... I really don't get how you and others assume we didn't get experience because if you watched us at all last year (which judging by that last sentence you clearly didn't), you'd see that we frequently subbed underclassmen on both sides of the ball and many of those "inexperienced" starters got plenty of reps last year in significant points in the game....

Having said that, I do agree with many here that point out the ridiculousness of those comments by the guy trying to compare you guys to the 2009 Boise State team, say you guys aren't deep/very good on defense, etc.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CajunFootball

Jackson, Mississippi

Member since Oct 2010

19432 posts

Posted on 5/26/11 at 12:42 pm to goducks75

Granted you got some players in there to get a little experience. I'm talking as an overall unit LSU has more experience then Oregon. We lost only a few people on defense and almost no one on offense.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by dgnx6

Baton Rouge

Member since Feb 2006

69226 posts

Posted on 5/26/11 at 6:32 pm to goducks75

Talking about experience here. Were they playing against the bamas, ufs, auburns, a&m? If you watch our games closely you will see some of these guys were thrusted into situations against top quality opponents when we were actually trailing. They werent getting mop up duty against scrub teams. Did you have 4 freshman in the secondary against stanford? Did you have sophomores on the oline pave the wY for a 1kyd rusher in the sec?

This is what we were working with and only lost 2 games in the toughest division in college football. Our young players have real starting experience.

The only questions i would have is finding a 3rd and 4th receiver and mlb. Thats where we lack experience. Sure we have guys that have played here and there andon special teams, but thats not the experience we are talking about.

This post was edited on 5/26/11 at 6:38 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board