Started By
Message

re: As the season draws closer and closer, Oregon fans get crazier and crazier

Posted on 6/2/11 at 10:58 pm to
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

As of current, from 1998 to the present, the PAC has a higher winning percentage vs AQ's then any other Conference.


That's because we don't need to play all those games against other conferences. Besides if we played a lot of games against the Big 10, Big East, ACC we'd look even better then we already do.


Also, you haven't responded to my post about how we play more bowl teams per year on average(including the national champions).
Posted by DucksflyinPAC
Portland, Oregon
Member since Mar 2011
1872 posts
Posted on 6/2/11 at 11:52 pm to
Cajun, I did not try to dodge anything. So much posting its hard to answer everyone. As far as your saying the SEC plays more bowl games then everyone, I am sure that is true. They get in by rankings and how many wins they add. If the SEC plays on average 3 cupcakes a year plus a decent game, you can see how their records are better then the Pac. But the SEC has not done too shabby either. Up to current time, in the BCS they are a very close #2 to the PAC in percentage of BCS AQ wins.

As far as your bowl game wins. Ya, the SEC has done good(except for last year). And BCS titles, of course, very very good. If really dig deep into my argument you will see that I clearly show the SEC to be very top dog in all CF. However there is one tiny, shitty Conference that is the PAC that has the SEC's number. lol And one cannot dispute play on the field vs each other.

And btw, there is another Conference that shows they have a better BCS era head to head record against you- the Big East. No joke! However, that does not take into account all last seasons games as that site is not updated. It was easy to update my PAC vs SEC games cause there were only 2 last year. I have no clue what the SEC did against the Big East. I think I can remember 1 or 2 losses though. But overall you might have won tons, I have no clue and right now, you might of surpassed them. As of the up to 2009 data, we only had one Conference more up then us, and that is the Big 12 and only by a game.

Any guy can quote past rankings, number of bowl wins, BCS titles, but head to head when we have faced, the PAC is on top. You do have one special thing going for ya. The SEC sent its best, the PAC sent its best, both undefeated till then and one lost, us. So we cant ever say anymore that the SEC never won a single title against us.

Bottom line, to translate all previous posts in this entire thread- DON'T F WITH THE DUCKS, lol. (its a song btw) don't F with the Ducks-song
Posted by CLDuck
Portland
Member since Jul 2010
145 posts
Posted on 6/3/11 at 12:14 am to
I'll have to give you the one about teams pulling out of games and the scramble to replace them and ending up with a D2 game. That happened to us last year.

One thing that playing 3 easy games does for a team is it makes it so you only have to win 3 games in conference to be bowl eligible. That isn't too hard. Tada, lots of teams bowl eligible.

As I said before, LSU hasn't been afraid to play a tough game in OOC. Pat yourself on the back. Shame on Georgia though. When a good team backs out on you, it's hard to replace them with another good team since scheduling is done so far in advance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram