Started By
Message

re: Gun control

Posted on 3/14/11 at 11:01 pm to
Posted by whitetailed
Da Rouge
Member since Nov 2010
1725 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

They will go after ammo


Exactly. People always seem to think guns. But look at it from a cost/time standpoint for them. Would you rather go house to house to people who have bought the firearm on record and ask them to present it for tagging (or confiscating or whatever the frick they would want) and have most people say they pawned it or lost it (as I would) and they couldn't do shite about it.

OR:stop selling ammo, or certain kinds of ammo, or jack the prices up so high no one can afford it and it's done. You can have all the guns in the world but if you don't have bullets who gives a frick.

And how many people reload? Sure there are some but the vast majority, me included, does not. But I need to start now that we are talking about this
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
44455 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

OR:stop selling ammo, or certain kinds of ammo, or jack the prices up so high no one can afford it and it's done. You can have all the guns in the world but if you don't have bullets who gives a frick.



I believe that California has already enacted a law stating that you can only buy X number of rounds in a given year or something like that. They have serial numbers attached with each box you buy and your name is put in a registry of sorts to track how much you have purchased.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram