- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RMD 2011 - In the Books!
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:32 pm to OBUDan
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:32 pm to OBUDan
So I'm trying to figure out my strategy for drafting. What would be theoretically better here... a guy ranked #20 overall but may have to sit a year or two or a guy ranked #40 overall but will be a 4 year starter?
Posted on 2/28/11 at 11:08 pm to TDawg1313
well we never really settled on a scoring system but generally the gist is rewarding awards and achievements in addition to high draft pick etc.
So you may be better off with a 4 year starter. But that's just how I approach this.
Driskel, for example, I chose not just because I think he's the best available but I like the situation he's walking into more.
So you may be better off with a 4 year starter. But that's just how I approach this.
Driskel, for example, I chose not just because I think he's the best available but I like the situation he's walking into more.
Posted on 3/1/11 at 7:34 am to TDawg1313
Aside from pure talent, the number one thing I look for is availability of playing time.
For example, one guy I am looking at this year will be behind 3 seniors and 2 juniors. So if he redshirts this year, he should get a little PT next, and then start the rest of his career.
For example, one guy I am looking at this year will be behind 3 seniors and 2 juniors. So if he redshirts this year, he should get a little PT next, and then start the rest of his career.
Posted on 3/1/11 at 9:08 am to TDawg1313
I look at talent, depth chart, school and coaching and make my decision from there. Most guys won't be four year starters, but I look for two or three year starters at major BCS schools because they have more chances for awards and to become major draft picks, and just be better players. I also look at where they are playing. LB from Penn State and tOSU, DB's from bama, QB's from SMU, Houston, WR from Mizzou, etc get a bump. Offensive lineman from UGA get a downgrade. That's pretty much my strategy. The first few rounds are pretty much best player available and it's hard to mess up unless you just pick a total bust player.
Posted on 3/1/11 at 10:18 am to TDawg1313
quote:
So I'm trying to figure out my strategy for drafting. What would be theoretically better here... a guy ranked #20 overall but may have to sit a year or two or a guy ranked #40 overall but will be a 4 year starter?
Since there's no really official scoring method.. I'd just say pick the guys who you think will end up the best (of course you get into how do you define best, but whatever you think).
For me, best are the guys that will be studs in college and NFL stars.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News