Started By
Message

re: Why wouldn't Miami go after Petrino ?

Posted on 12/3/10 at 10:42 am to
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10236 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 10:42 am to
Miami is not the attractive job it was 10 years ago.
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Miami is not the attractive job it was 10 years ago.


And arkansas just committed to building first class facilities. Something the U seem unwilling to do.
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
33039 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Miami is not the attractive job it was 10 years ago.


That's rediculous.

Recruiting in Miami is a no brainer, especially compared to ArKansas. There will always be ebbs and flows with Miami, Florida and FSU with talent, but even down recruiting years are still pretty damn good.

Miami is still the U and as long as Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Jeremy Shockey, Frank Gore, Clinton Portis, Kellen Winslow II, Greg Olsen, Ray Lewis, Brandon Meriweather and Jonathan Vilma are still in the NFL, the U has a lot of cache. They are still a team that gets pub and rankings when they aren't that great.

At arKansas, you are a mid tier program of your own conference and will have to be compared to LSU, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee, Florida and Georgia. In the ACC, FSU and Miami had the program tailor made for them to succeed. It's Miami, Florida State and Virginia Tech.

Location, Location, Location. No brainer.

Facilities at the U kind of suck. That's about the only downside of coaching at the U.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram