re: Indian Mounds to be fenced again

quote:

---

The fact that they're 6000 years old and in need of preservation for all of mankind

---

you make things into fact that aren't fact and then make outlandish and irrational analogies to try to prove your point.

If they've survived 6000 years as you say, show me where it's a FACT that they now must be preserved. And your shitting on the vietnam memorial analogy compared to the mounds is off base. If they're just hills used for looking at the river, that's not quite the same as the vietnam memorial in terms of importance. If all they are, are high ground look out points, then they are quite simply, hills. Now they have more cultural significance than that to LSU and to me, but all these people talking about burial grounds and ancient artifacts being there are off base, based on past research and other archeologists