Started By
Message

re: Handball practically in the goal

Posted on 7/2/10 at 10:29 pm to
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 7/2/10 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

How about this, you do a redcard handball in the box behind your keeper, and its a goal. Simple.


No, you don't give a touchdown for pass interference in the endzone. You don't give a home run to the Orioles because the Yankee kid fan interfered and no one called it. You don't give two points for fouling a basketball player on a layup. You don't give a goal in hockey for tripping a fast break.
Posted by Crede15
Member since Jun 2009
17215 posts
Posted on 7/2/10 at 10:42 pm to
none of those are really comparable (well at least to today's play), the touchdown pass could be dropped, the guy could miss the layup, the hockey player could shoot wide, etc., etc. I get that people think it would be too arbitrary a rule but those aren't comparable to a ball that is obviously going in the net unless someone keeps it out with their hand.

The problem with the rule would be the situations where it would be too much to interpret, i.e. if a ball looks like its going in but it could have possibly hit the post.
This post was edited on 7/2/10 at 10:49 pm
Posted by ornagestorm
Oregon
Member since Jun 2008
5105 posts
Posted on 7/2/10 at 10:45 pm to
he was caught with a handball, same thing happened in the Aussie game, the guy just missed the shot, that's why they lost.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram