Started By
Message
locked post

A&M has UT by the Balls and needs to pull a Jackie Sherrill

Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:16 am
Posted by GarlandTiger
Garland, Tx.
Member since Dec 2007
356 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:16 am
A&M has sucked all the power out of UT and are in the driver’s seat. UT does not want the SEC in Texas and A&M is blowing up that PAC-16 option. UT is right where A&M put them and needs to follow through and castrate them. They should come out and say "we did not start this be we are going to finish it with our move to the SEC".

Posted by Mike Linebacker
Texas
Member since Sep 2009
3404 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:18 am to
If A&M goes to the SEC, UT goes to the Pac-10. That's not the worst situation for them.

So no one has anyone by the balls.
Posted by Carlos Santannaclaus
Houston
Member since Jan 2008
3272 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:20 am to
quote:

hey should come out and say "we did not start this be we are going to finish it with our move to the SEC"


Good idea. UT is trying to manipulate the situation now to make A&M the bad guy in this. By publicly saying they'll support the Big 12 (-2) then they think this casts A&M in the villains roll.

People should see through this, unless they wear burnt orange colored glasses.
Posted by GarlandTiger
Garland, Tx.
Member since Dec 2007
356 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:22 am to
Wrong. It is not about money with UT. It is about recruits. UT does not want the SEC recruiting in Texas. UT wraps up their recruiting class a year in advance. Mack does not have to work for his recruits. That will change. UT is looking to save the Big 12 now because of A&M and the SEC.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
56582 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Texas will goto the PAC-10


but UTs deal to the PAC-10 isn't as lucrative w/o little sister, hence their backtracking this AM tryin to save the b12

if A&M goes to the SEC i wouldn't be suprised to see UT to the Big10
Posted by Carlos Santannaclaus
Houston
Member since Jan 2008
3272 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Wrong. It is not about money with UT. It is about recruits.


It's about money and image. Recruiting is a subset of money. You get good recruits, you have a good team, you get money.

Image is important to UT, too. They want to look the part of the big dog and good guy.
Posted by GarlandTiger
Garland, Tx.
Member since Dec 2007
356 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 10:28 am to
"For all the talk about money, the issue that will most impact actual football games is recruiting. Conference affiliation – who you play, where you play, where the game is on television – can dramatically change who and from where you can recruit"

LINK
Posted by TammanyMan02
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
380 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:37 pm to
With the tensions between A&M and Texas at perhaps an all-time high because of the way the Horns have handled things throughout this ordeal (remember, it was the Aggies, not the Horns who presented SEVERAL ideas to keep the Big 12 together during their meeting on Thursday), I don't see how the Pac-10 could even be a viable option. It's either a kiss-and-make-up deal with both teams staying in the Big 12 or A&M goes SEC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram