- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for the Attornies...Particularly IP
Posted on 5/5/10 at 9:25 pm to ForeLSU
Posted on 5/5/10 at 9:25 pm to ForeLSU
Absent a copyright by the client, or other contractual specification, I wouldn't think the client has any rights whatsoever in the code. A copyright, as opposed to a patent, would govern the code itself. Patents extend to the idea (i.e. the product for sale or the actual software itself) while a copyright would extend to the particular form in which the idea is expressed (i.e. the actual code itself). I don't know what kind of company would be clueless enough not to apply for a copyright in this situation, but absent one, they don't have much of a claim at all.
I'd think a trade secret would accomplish the same goal as a copyright, but it still wouldn't be as strong as a copyright, and still wouldn't protect against reverse engineering, etc.
This is not legal advice.
I'd think a trade secret would accomplish the same goal as a copyright, but it still wouldn't be as strong as a copyright, and still wouldn't protect against reverse engineering, etc.
This is not legal advice.
This post was edited on 5/5/10 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 5/6/10 at 9:57 am to RedStickBR
quote:
I don't know what kind of company would be clueless enough not to apply for a copyright in this situation, but absent one, they don't have much of a claim at all.
Thanks for the info...
I think the key point in this case is the transaction. The company didn't buy "software" from the contractor, they bought programming services. The resultant code is specific to this application and has no commercial market, the functional design and specification was done by the company. The contractor is attempting to lock the customer in for any modifications or changes. (which in this case is really short-sighted since the client has about another large contract coming up)
As an example, say the company makes gizmos and needs a program to track the machine operator and the serial number. Nothing exists on the commercial market, so they call Bob's Nerds and request a programmer for 40 hours to assist them in writing an application to meet the requirement. Let's say a year later, the company adds 10 machines and needs to modify the code to add machine ID to the records. However, the Nerds password protected the source file, and claims the source is their property.
I realize the client was ignorant by not specifying terms and conditions. I would think this would be similar to a magazine contracting a free-lance writer to develop content for a piece they're doing. Would the writer hold the rights to the piece, or the magazine? (again, absent any specific agreement)
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News