- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ...why...
Posted on 3/15/10 at 6:27 am to Chrome
Posted on 3/15/10 at 6:27 am to Chrome
I think the media perception of the Colts was that they won every game they tried to win, while the Saints lost to the Cowboys and the Bucs when they needed to win. That may have put him over the top.
I don't agree though.
I don't agree though.
1
Posted on 3/15/10 at 7:15 am to BBATiger
quote:
1) The Colts had a better record. When voters were casting their ballots, the Saints were on a three game slide and finished a game behind the Colts.
2) Many uneducated voters feel that Sean Peyton is so good that his system provides a large portion of Brees's statistical outpouring. On the flip side, Manning was dealing with a rookie head coach and, for all intents and purposes, was the quarterback AND offensive coordinator.
This is the best answer right here. I can understand it from this point of view.
But just 109.6 to 99.9 is a big difference (rounded up 110 to 100 or 109 to 100.)
(And of course Drew Brees doesn't care.)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News