Started By
Message

re: 3rd and Chavis as something that cost LSU = Myth

Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by Tigercat
Tacoma, WA
Member since Feb 2004
4518 posts
Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

what about the 53% of 3rd down opponents converted in the 4th quarter of our losses? alarming, no?


Yes, but overall 3rd down conversions has nothing to do with "3rd and Chavis," and with our DL play this year, and our lack of sustained drives, no scheme would have held up in the 4th quarter.

Now if you want to blame our horrid DL play on Chavis have at it. But that was the real huge weakness of our team this year.
Posted by Cookieman
Texas
Member since Nov 2009
782 posts
Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

what about the 53% of 3rd down opponents converted in the 4th quarter of our losses? alarming, no?



It tells me they were fukking tired...

And probably pissed that the offense couldnt stay on the field for more than a minute at a time...

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram