Started By
Message

re: The following QB's had worse Efficiency ratings than JJ

Posted on 12/14/09 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by zaychik
Member since Sep 2009
1624 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 3:58 pm to
luckily for him, the 30 sacks he took didn't count against it.
Posted by BigDogGambler
The Ship
Member since Oct 2009
997 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

luckily for him, the 30 sacks he took didn't count against it.


+1
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76635 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

luckily for him, the 30 sacks he took didn't count against it.
because all sacks are 100% his fault. The "held the ball too long" argument is valid in only a few of the cases. Most sacks came before he was set.

Our interior line failed miserably this year.

Maybe we should blame JJ for the drops by our WR's, too? Since we are going to blame him for everything, why not be consistent?
This post was edited on 12/14/09 at 4:04 pm
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32456 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 4:03 pm to
He's got issues like taking too many sacks, not throwing downfield enough and taking some chances, and fearlessness. I agree with you though that the efficiency rate is prob what kept up from being a 7-5 team this year, if we had the # of turnovers we had last year with this putrid offense, we would have lost a lot of game.s
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9599 posts
Posted on 12/14/09 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

luckily for him, the 30 sacks he took didn't count against it.


+1000000000000
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram