- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Saints penalties vs. Redskins penalties
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:01 pm
Saints Redskins
Penalties - Yards 7-102 2-15
Refs are not calling the games properly, how can this be?
Penalties - Yards 7-102 2-15
Refs are not calling the games properly, how can this be?

Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:02 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
I was pissed at all the penalties. Maybe it was just them not getting penalties, or us getting a lot-but when it's that lopsided you wonder a little bit. 

Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:04 pm to Tygerq
They balanced it out with a couple of favorable reviews IMO.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:13 pm to rpg37
quote:
They balanced it out with a couple of favorable reviews IMO.
Favorable? How'd you think they should go? The reviews were done correctly.
Here's some numbers on our opponents the last couple weeks and their games around ours:
TB:
5 for 50
8 for 52
3 for 18 *
9 for 77
NE:
6 for 82
0 for 0 *
5 for 28
3 for 35
WAS: 2 for 15 *
7 for 39
5 for 27
4 for 45
Teams have had their best games against us, penalty wise, conveniently for the past couple of weeks.
I haven't looked at the full stats of the season, but I have a feeling as "16 - 0" started getting more talk, the penalties steadily got lower and lower. At some point it becomes less theory and more "what the frick is going on here?"
eta: * is against us.
This post was edited on 12/6/09 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:14 pm to Eternalmajin
quote:
I haven't looked at the full stats of the season, but I have a feeling as "16 - 0" started getting more talk, the penalties steadily got lower and lower. At some point it becomes less theory and more "what the frick is going on here?"
The members of the 1972 Miami Dolphins have verrrrrry deep pockets.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:17 pm to lsuboyfriend
That fumble could have been inconclusive...
Now having said that... if they would have called it a fumble on the field like the eventually did after review, it would have gone for a defensive TD for McAlister.
Now having said that... if they would have called it a fumble on the field like the eventually did after review, it would have gone for a defensive TD for McAlister.
Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:17 pm to lsuboyfriend
quote:
The members of the 1972 Miami Dolphins have verrrrrry deep pockets.

Posted on 12/6/09 at 4:23 pm to Eternalmajin
quote:
Perhaps. But the Colts are receiving the exact opposite treatment. 130 yards in penalties against the Texans last week. Why only us? Is this the NFL equivalent of Kobe treatment? Colts have been around more, so they get the calls?
In the past, the Colts have "let their foot off the accelerator" when they have clinched home field for the playoffs, even when they're undefeated. So they rest their starters and that's when they lose. So the Dolphins aren't really concerned about the Colts.
Back to top
