Started By
Message

re: Dyer vs. Seastrunk - who would you rather (for all schools)

Posted on 12/4/09 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 12:36 pm to
quote:


Holliday is 5-5 161, Seastrunk is listed at 5-10 192. Both listings are probably exagerrated a bit but Seastrunk is bigger. I think holliday is more of a track star playing football and seastrunk is more of a football player with track speed.


Regardless of size...he's hitting the edges...That's his MO...same with Holiday..
Posted by AuRob
Mobile, Al
Member since Aug 2008
777 posts
Posted on 12/4/09 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Regardless of size...he's hitting the edges...That's his MO...same with Holiday..


I agree, and I also agree with you on taking Dyer first. My point was Seastrunk, if he goes somewhere with the offensive intellectual capacity to utilize his talents he can be a much more complete player than Holliday. Holiday was a return specialist and a gimmick player used occasionally on offense.

I believe Seastrunk, with college strength and conditioning and coaching, can put up huge numbers in the right type of an offense. He is raw right now but he has feakish speed and athletic ability (see that photo of his vertical jump that has been posted on here a million times) and thats something that cant be taught. He isn't going to be a 20 carry a game type back but I think he can get 10-15 touches a game in a variety of ways and be a real difference maker.
This post was edited on 12/4/09 at 3:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram