re: Saints-Vikings Comparison

quote:

---

, but pierre + bell + bush > AP

---

Name one GM in the league that would take those 3 backs over AP. Also, some teams are still game planning solely to stop AP (which is one reason Favre is lighting teams up). If you are wondering why Favre threw 48 times against the Bears, it's because the Bears kept stacking the box. Chester Taylor is no slouch and would start for multiple teams.

quote:

---

Receiving Corps-Saints - this one shows how stupid you are. saints starting 3 receivers (colston, henderson, meachem) are better than anyone on the vikings roster. and then throw shockey is for kicks.

---

This is where you really show your ignorance. Sidney Rice and Colston are a wash. Berrian has had a more productive career than anyone on the Saints excluding Colston. Lastly, I'd take Harvin over any Saints receiver not named Colston. The Saints are deeper at receiver, but less talented at the top. I believe the Saints have not one but two TEs that are better than what the Vikings have(Shockey and Thomas).

quote:

---

D-Line-Push- Jared Allen is great. Will Smith has been great as well. add that sedrick ellis and out d-line can go toe-to-toe with yours

---

This is just retarded.

quote:

---

Coaching-Saints - a well coached team will always win. saints coaches are at the top of their game.

---

It's obvious the Saints have the coaching advantage, but saying the better coached team always wins is fricking stupid. I'm sure in the history of football a badly coached team has never beaten a well coached team. Also, big players make big plays. The Vikings have the better playmakers.

quote:

---

saints would win probably 42-17.

---

I'd say the Vikings are better than the Colts but worse than the Saints as of now. Predicting a 42-17 score just shows how much of a homer you are. Do you really think the Saints are 25 points better than the next best team in the league?