Started By
Message

re: True Romance

Posted on 11/6/09 at 3:41 pm to
Posted by TDTGodfather
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6169 posts
Posted on 11/6/09 at 3:41 pm to
it's probably in my top 10 or 15 of all time.

too many good scenes.

the scene with arquette and gandolfini (sp?) was raw as hell. great stuff.

Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49621 posts
Posted on 11/6/09 at 3:55 pm to
The Arquette/Ganfolfini and Walken/Hopper scenes were amazing, but it was a disappointing film overall. Something about it was just off, I think it's on Scott and the two main characters being not nearly as interesting as the supporting characters. Slater and Arquette aren't bad actors, but it was a really bad outing from them. And IIRC, it was scored horribly. Like, bad enough for me to notice how poorly scored it was, which is rare. I wish Tarantino would have directed it similarly to Reservoir Dogs, he'd have put some great music in there.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34751 posts
Posted on 11/6/09 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

it's probably in my top 10 or 15 of all time.
I totally agree. I have seen this movie many times and find it to be completely underrated. The scenes are awesome, Slater and Arquette do terrific jobs, Walken and Hopper almost steal the whole damn movie.

Too many great scenes and very fine jobs by all the cameos.

This is one of those movies that I don't think gets enough love.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram