Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Can someone help explain the Wimbeldon bracket for me?

Posted on 7/3/09 at 1:56 pm
Posted by wallykirch
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
135 posts
Posted on 7/3/09 at 1:56 pm
All top 4 women's seeds made it to the semis yesterday. Every tourny I've ever seen in my life would've had 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. This would've meant teh Williams' sisters would've played in the semis not the finals. Wimbeldon had 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 4 in the semis. How and why did the pairings work out like that?
Posted by Ron Mexico
AMERICA
Member since Dec 2005
52037 posts
Posted on 7/3/09 at 1:57 pm to
the bracket is soooo much bigger


i know in the mens, they play seven matches, instead of six

more players mean different lineups
Posted by thirtyseven
Member since Dec 2007
2577 posts
Posted on 7/3/09 at 1:59 pm to
I'll never understand it, but in this year's women's bracket (if all top seeds would have advanced), the quarterfinals would have been 1 vs 5, 3 vs 6, 4 vs 7, and 2 vs 8

Seriously, how the hell does that make any sense?

ETA: Looked up the 2008 bracket. If all tops seeds advanced, pairings in the quarters would have been 1 vs 8, 4 vs 6, 3 vs 5, and 2 vs 7.
That doesn't seem to make much sense either.
This post was edited on 7/3/09 at 2:03 pm
Posted by wallykirch
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
135 posts
Posted on 7/3/09 at 2:01 pm to
Exactly. It shouldn't matter how big the field is, because if all high seeds win out you should still end up with 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3 in the semis.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram