- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Chavis and DE prospects
Posted on 6/23/09 at 8:51 am
Posted on 6/23/09 at 8:51 am
When I had first read about Chavis, I got the understanding that he wanted huge DTs and DEs to soak up blockers so the Eric Alexander-type LBs could be free to make plays.
I may have misunderstood the whole thing to be ALL FOUR Dlinemen to be huge when in fact only the DTs are to be cloggers.
**
Does he like for his DTs to clog the middle, while smaller DEs can get around an OT?
or
Does he rely on all four to be big where a Jordan Allen-type of DE is on both sides?
I understand that there will be situational rushers on the end.....but what is Chavis' overall philosophy from first to third down?
DE DT DT DE
or
de DT DT DE
or
de DT DT de
I may have misunderstood the whole thing to be ALL FOUR Dlinemen to be huge when in fact only the DTs are to be cloggers.
**
Does he like for his DTs to clog the middle, while smaller DEs can get around an OT?
or
Does he rely on all four to be big where a Jordan Allen-type of DE is on both sides?
I understand that there will be situational rushers on the end.....but what is Chavis' overall philosophy from first to third down?
DE DT DT DE
or
de DT DT DE
or
de DT DT de
This post was edited on 6/23/09 at 8:52 am
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:11 am to dstone12
I think he prefers
deDTTDdeT
or
DEDTdtDETD
either way is fin.e
deDTTDdeT
or
DEDTdtDETD
either way is fin.e
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:15 am to Foul Canal
Ha, okay, that's wierd because nowhere in that post did I ask some 5'5" fig to anwser the question with some gay remark.
Seriously, if you don't know the answer or don't care to put in your two cents, you can make this board less of a joke by not trying to be some dork that looks for questions just to say 'germans' or something gay like what you said above.
Seriously, if you don't know the answer or don't care to put in your two cents, you can make this board less of a joke by not trying to be some dork that looks for questions just to say 'germans' or something gay like what you said above.
This post was edited on 6/23/09 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:31 am to dstone12
quote:ORLY
Seriously, if you don't know the answer or don't care to put in your two cents, you can make this board less of a joke by not trying to be some dork that looks for questions just to say 'germans' or something gay like what you said above.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:52 am to dstone12
quote:
dstone12
if at first you don't succeed, try, try again
Posted on 6/23/09 at 10:37 am to dstone12
I know he has had some big DT in the past, but I wouldn't call them run stuffers or anything. A. Hanyesworth, Justin Harrell and Jesse Mahelona.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 10:40 pm to Suntiger
John Henderson, Albert Hayneworth, Rashad Mooore, Aubrayo Franklin,Demetrin Veal, Justin Harrell, Tony McDaniel, Jesse Mahalona,
Chavis recruits LBS.and beefs them up to DE"s..just about every DE that played at UT was a high school lb..He usually beefs up his Safeties and makes them LB"s.. Just the way he done it at UT.
Chavis recruits LBS.and beefs them up to DE"s..just about every DE that played at UT was a high school lb..He usually beefs up his Safeties and makes them LB"s.. Just the way he done it at UT.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:35 pm to Foul Canal
That post hurt my brain.
FACT
FACT
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:44 pm to LSUTigerguy789
quote:
ORLY
Yes really.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 1:06 am to dstone12
Yeah, he has always had smaller/faster DEs than what LSU has had. That's why I'm surprised he hasn't offered that Bonomolo guy yet.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 2:50 am to ColtsTigers
Thanks for the people that anwser the question right, good info.

Posted on 6/24/09 at 8:55 am to Tiger4
I like the sig quote. Ben Franklin has one of my favorites:
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 4:17 pm to Cussian
quote:Thats a great one, you should come to the poli-board sometime.
I like the sig quote. Ben Franklin has one of my favorites:
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Popular
Back to top

3







